Repository Tagging, why don't we do it?

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Monday 08 June 2009 09:55:56 am Adam Miller wrote:
> There was a topic of conversation that was brought up in #rhel that I
> wanted to address here on the mailing lists. What about repo tagging?
> Why do (all that I know of) other 3rd party repositories seem to tag
> their packages in respect to their repo such as foo-0.1.i386.el5.rf or
> foo-0.1.i386.el5.at (or however the method is preferred) and we don't?
>
> Just wanted to post the question here because I didn't/don't have the
> answer.
>
> Thanks,
>     -Adam
It was debated in great length when epel started.  please go back and read the 
mailing lists if you want to know.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090608/9071e370/attachment.sig>