Repository Tagging, why don't we do it?

Bryan J Smith bjs at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 12:13:11 UTC 2009


On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Adam Miller<maxamillion at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sorry to all parties involved if I have brought up old cruft that
> should have been left to the grave but I wasn't aware and was just
> seeking an answer. Thanks to dgilmore for pointing me to the archives,
> I found the thread and read through it.

On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 16:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Its ok... its going to be asked every 6 months no matter what. It is
> one of those things that caused a lot of wounds that seem to have
> stayed festering. There are technical reasons people wanted it and
> there were emotional/psychological reasons (eg identity) people wanted
> it. And there were similar reasons 'against' it. In the end one side
> got chosen and that's pretty much it.

We should probably consider sending out a monthly FAQ with the monthly
subscription info, things that answer these type of FAQs.


-- 
Bryan J Smith     Senior Consultant    Red Hat GPS SE US
mailto:bjs at redhat.com         +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) 
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org     (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) 
-------------------------------------------------------- 
You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%
no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.
But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other
software and services firms for their own, direct needs? 
It's no comparison:  http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ 




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list