Moin in EPEL

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:47:21 +0300
Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

...snip...

> With these points in mind: 
>  - Are there any people on the list who'd like to become
> co-maintainers or even primary maintainers for Moin in the EPEL
> branches?
>  - Should we just update Moin to a version with upstream support
> even though it might cause major pain to anyone running the current 
>    packages?
>  - Related to these questions, once even Debian drops 1.5, is there 
>    going to be enough people in the EPEL project to take care of the 
>    possible security issues?
>  - If not, should we just orphan Moin in EPEL?

Yeah, EPEL packages should not do this kind of thing if at all
possible, but sometimes it's impossible to avoid. :(

We do have now a 'epel-announce' list. An announcement about this sort
of change would be very good to go there. 

Information on how to deal with the upgrade would also be welcome in a
README.Fedora file or the like... 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090617/f5cff187/attachment.sig>