FUSE packages in EPEL

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Sat Oct 17 08:37:57 UTC 2009

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 06:06:38AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/17/2009 05:34 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > 
> > We usually wait until CentOS and we also try not to throw stones in
> > glass houses about how long it takes for volunteers to get a package
> > set done.
> Let them take however they want. I have no problems with that
> considering that EPEL itself is a volunteer community. I don't
> understand what the real problem is in pushing packages that CentOS
> users can just choose to not install till a new release from them is
> out. It benefits RHEL users and doesn't harm CentOS users in any way.
> Does it?

Imho the biggest problem is, that there will be probably a lot less
testers of the packages and even some maintainers will not be able to
test their own packages or locally build the package using mock.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20091017/6aec3aa6/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list