New git in EPEL?
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Oct 28 17:31:43 UTC 2009
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:30 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> If we're going to violate policy, why exactly do we have one to begin
Would it really be a policy break if the old command paths were
retained? AFAIK the removal of the git-* commands from /usr/bin was the
only real 'break' between the versions, and if those are retained than
it should be an acceptable upgrade.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the epel-devel-list