EPEL built against RHEL or CentOS?

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Tue Apr 6 16:38:07 UTC 2010

On Tuesday 06 April 2010 11:07:31 am Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:39:20AM -0700, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> > On 04/06/2010 07:53 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> It's always been RHEL as far as I know.  It's just recently that the
> >>> needed changes were made to Koji so that packages could be built
> >>> against RHEL without making the RHEL bits public.
> >> 
> >> Where are the details of this change?
> >> 
> >> Rich.
> > 
> > Are you looking for discussion (it came up on this list several times as
> > well as in multiple steering committee meetings), or code changes, or
> > something else?
> Discussion or anything else.  My google-fu can't find anything ...
> Rich.
There is no change, EPEL has always been built against RHEL,  we used plague 
until koji supported external repos. the move to koji happened then.  apache 
on the rhel mirror prevents access to rhel bits from outside of fedora so we 
dont make the bits public.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100406/cdd5ce61/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list