skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Wed Aug 11 15:46:15 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:24 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 15:01, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >> Completely ridiculous but this is the 2nd time in a couple of weeks I've
> >> seen this happen.
> >> Apparently new users are installing epel as a repo onto fedora...
> >> I assume they are doing by installing epel-release which is kinda
> >> special.
> >> nevertheless - how painful/bad would it be if we added a 'Conflicts:
> >> fedora-release' to the epel-release spec?
> > Oh I was going to say
> > Obsoletes: Fedora
> > or
> > ExcludeOS: Fedora
> > but no that does sound like a good idea.
> >> -sv
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> epel-devel-list mailing list
> >> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
> > --
> > Stephen J Smoogen.
> > “The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.”
> > Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
> > "We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things.""
> > — Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines
> > _______________________________________________
> > epel-devel-list mailing list
> > epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
> Should be easy enough. I can make the edit and push a new one.
I have an edit of one, too.
did you already do it?
More information about the epel-devel-list