Proposal on what packages can be in EPEL6

Kevin Fenzi kevin at
Tue Dec 21 22:57:53 UTC 2010

On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:32:04 -0700
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at> wrote:


> Well, there's downsides to either. I guess just adding a ExclusiveArch
> isn't too much change, but it is change. Would it be bad just just
> import and rebuild them exactly from the src.rpm? 
> We should spell out what we want here exactly for sure. 

Replying to myself here. Obviously we do have to modify them because
the rhel ones have either Exclusivearch or Excludearch anyhow.

So, I think it would make sense to require adding: 

ExclusiveArch: ppc64

to any rhel src.rpms that we rebuild for epel. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list