nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel

[Adam Miller]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:34 AM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Adam Miller
> <maxamillion at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> All this discussion is great and I think everyone has had solid
>> concerns and good points but it still leaves the original question
>> unanswered.
>>
>> Do we stick to our policy as is or do we want to make a revision?
>
> It seems to me looking in from the outside that you have already made
> a revision to the policy by including 389, nagios, and possibly other
> things. Might as well move on the figuring out what the real policy is
> going to be and correctly documenting it.
>
<SNIP>

Well that's kind of my point, if we stick to the policy as it stands
then we need to pull the violating packages.

-AdamM


-- 
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments