nagios shipped by RedHat, but in a specific subscription channel

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Wed Jan 13 09:26:55 UTC 2010


On 12/01/10 20:27, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller
> <maxamillion at fedoraproject.org>  wrote:
>> Here's a proposal:
>>
>> Let's make an alteration to our current policy to something of the
>> effect that "we do not ship any package that has an openly available
>> RPM/SRPM located in any child directory of
>> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ but we are unable to
>> verify that there will be no conflicts as not all channels are
>> published."
>>
>> Beyond that I don't think there is any realistic expectation of us to
>> know what we could potentially conflict with if the information is not
>> publicly available.
>>
>> -AdamM
>
> "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
> packages in RHEL or layered products."
>
> to
>
> "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace
> packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly
> available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ]

s/complimentary/complementary/

Paul.




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list