Packages duplicated between EL-5 sub-channels and EPEL

[David Juran]

On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 08:20 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:06 AM, David Juran <djuran at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:21 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

> >
> > I think we've been through this before, but if EPEL would ship the same
> > version that Red Hat does of the layered products then there wouldn't be
> > any conflict for those who have the layered product and the one's who do
> > have the layered product can still enjoy the package. Or am I missing
> > something here?
> >
> 
> It would conflict because you have essentially the same package, same
> version, same release, etc. but from two different sources. 

Sorry, what I meant was that the release number should be lower in EPEL.
I.e. the EPEL package would be identical to the RHEL one except that the
release number would be lower.

-- 
David Juran
Sr. Consultant
Red Hat
+358-504-146348
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100118/79244ee3/attachment.sig>