my EPEL-6 packages up for takers
fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk
Thu Jul 1 11:30:35 UTC 2010
One of my packages has a dependency on docbook2X, so I will take that one.
On 2 May 2010 00:51, Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> I won't, at least for now, maintain the packages I maintain in EPEL-5 in
> EPEL-6. I have added a nobranch file in all of them. If you want to take up
> the package, you can. It is still unclear to me how to practically ensure
> that you become the EPEL-6 branch owner, instead of me, though. Hopefully
> this will be sorted out.
> If you want to maintain the EL-5 (or even EL-4) branch too, don't
> hesitate, the less package I maintain the better I am.
> I think that wdm should not be maintained in EL-6 anyway, since upstream
> is dead and there is no ConsoleKit integration.
> For the dap-* packages it maybe worth waiting for a stabilisation of
> the ABI, and maybe integration with bes and packaging of olfs to have a
> working hyrax server before branching. My guess is that there are no
> users of these packages anyway. Also maybe the opendap implementantion
> in netcdf itself could be used instead of libdap/libnc-dap.
> The list is:
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the epel-devel-list