EPEL test mass rebuild results

Gilboa Davara gilboad at gmail.com
Wed Jul 14 14:47:15 UTC 2010


On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:05 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 07/07/10 21:59, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:47:26PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> Wow thats a lot of packages. I need to get a build system like that at
> >> home :). For me personally it will be interesting to see why alpine
> >> fails to build. On the other hand it is nice that so much of F12 can
> >> be built on it. [Me I want to do this experiment with
> >> EPEL-4/EPEL-5/EPEL-6 and F-X :) but I am a completist.]
> >
> > here's the alpine log.  Looks like the perl-version package got built,
> > and started getting pulled in, but conflicts.
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597982
> 
> Paul.

I'm seeing 3 package failures (icewm, idesk and gmrun) due to the perl
error.
Any change of redoing the build once it is fixed?

- Gilboa




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list