Upgrade hack for bacula in EPEL5
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Sun Mar 14 20:23:01 UTC 2010
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:22:44 +0100
Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I built bacula 2.4.4 in EPEL5 to fix the current upgrade
> problems as described previously here (2010-02-07). I just pushed the
> update to testing:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-2.4.4-2.el5
>
> I updated a couple of internal systems of mine without any problems.
> However I would like to see more testing if possible.
An excellent idea. ;)
> IMHO the update should stay in testing for 2 months. Who should I
> ping so that the package is not pushed automatically? Is it enough if
> I just don't push it to stable?
Make sure the web interface shows that you have unset "Enable karma
automatism" so a +3 karma won't automatically push it to stable.
> Kevin Fenzi also mentioned that this update should be mentioned on
> the announcement list when it hits stable. What's the process of
> writing an email to that list?
It's a moderated list:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-announce
Just explain what was changed, whats in the update, what to expect and
how to provide feedback.
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100314/54891af4/attachment.sig>
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list