EL-6 branch status

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Mon May 3 13:19:43 UTC 2010

On Monday 03 May 2010 05:26:26 am Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 01.05.2010 21:23, schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
> > Just a FYI  and reminder to make sure that if you have something in EL-5
> > you dont want branched to take care of it by putting a nobranch file in
> > the EL-5 branch in cvs
> Do I have to put a nobranch file into CVS if my package is included in
> RHEL6? That's what I remember from previous mails - however my
> "affected" packages do not show up neither in 'excluded' not in
> 'tobranch' (bacula, python-zope-interface).
> fs

you don't have to,  but it would be nice to document why there is not a EL-6 
branch.  anything that is in RHEL-6 will not be branched. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20100503/04334498/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list