FFTW for EL6

seth vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Thu Nov 11 21:36:13 UTC 2010


On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:38:42 -0700
> Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 09/16/2010 10:27 AM, Mark Chappell wrote:
> > > On 16 September 2010 17:48, Orion Poplawski<orion at cora.nwra.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Any progress on getting fftw into EL6?  Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3916
> > >
> > > I think we're still waiting to hear from Red Hat if there's going to
> > > be a RHEL6 equivalent of the RHEL5 "productivity" channel that
> > > provides the packages that are in the WorkStation build to the
> > > Server build, we really want to minimise any fiddling we may have
> > > to do post General Availability...
> > 
> > Sorry to be a pest about this, but now that RHEL 6 has been announced
> > do we know any more?  I don't see a fftw src.rpm in 6Server,
> > 6Workstation, 6Client, 6ComputeNode, or in 
> > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6/en/source/SRPMS/.
> 
> Yeah, I don't see any of the 'optional' srpms in there... and now we
> have 'server' 'workstation' and 'client'. ;( 
> 
> I'm not sure if thats intentional or some oversight, etc. 
> 

the optional srpms are in there.

I just confirmed a bunch of them with Karanbir - it looks like it was
just a syncing thing.

but they are definitely there now.

-sv





More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list