(1/3) Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2011-04-24

Robert Scheck robert at fedoraproject.org
Sun Apr 24 23:42:59 UTC 2011


On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 12:47 AM, Robert Scheck wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>c) create a lzop package in EPEL, but keep it at the exact same version
> >>as the RHEL one (ie, import the same version exactly and try and keep
> >>it in sync).
> >I prefer c), because not the whole world is x86_64.
> Then go for it.

Eh...in the meantime I somehow recognized, that I'm the lzop owner...

I'm going to request an EPEL 6 branch (with clarification) and would add an
"ExcludeArch: x86_64" to the *.spec file - any objections or better ideas?


Greetings,
  Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20110425/644347c2/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list