Major version upgrades - acceptable if in number only?
Stephen John Smoogen
smooge at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 19:04:18 UTC 2012
On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden <niveusluna at www.niveusluna.org> wrote:
> I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release
> version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new
> supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should
> I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If
> indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the
> resulting package 1.x in name only.
I think this would be ok.
> Thank you.
> Russell Golden
> Fedora Project Contributor
> niveusluna at niveusluna.org
> (972) 836-7128
> "We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will
> add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your
> culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile."
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
More information about the epel-devel-list