Overlap policy v20120615

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 19:26:59 UTC 2012

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:43:52PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> So the build system is os+optional+lb+ha+rs+other stuff I don't recall
> if I understood previously but EPEL only prohibits shipping packages
> from os+optional+lb+ha. I'm wondering why the restriction against
> shipping packages isn't just os+optional here.
My understanding is that the buildsystem is os+optional+lb+ha which is the
set of channels that we are saying we won't conflict with.  In my view, that
part should always remain consistent.

This doesn't address the "How do I tell if a package shipped by Red Hat
Channel Foo can be added to EPEL?" question.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20120615/791119d2/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list