Keep or remove GlusterFS from EPEL-6?

Mark Chappell tremble at tremble.org.uk
Thu May 24 06:57:44 UTC 2012


On 24 May 2012 08:40, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> Sorry if I've missed this answered elsewhere, but why don't the RHEL
> layered products use e.g. Puppet from EPEL instead of bundling it?

Because then Red Hat would end up trying to support packages that it
didn't build or control the release cycles for, which would make QA a
nightmare and bring many extra headaches for the Support teams.


Mark




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list