Keep or remove GlusterFS from EPEL-6?

[Alan Pevec]

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mark Chappell <tremble at tremble.org.uk> wrote:
> On 24 May 2012 08:40, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Sorry if I've missed this answered elsewhere, but why don't the RHEL
>> layered products use e.g. Puppet from EPEL instead of bundling it?
>
> Because then Red Hat would end up trying to support packages that it
> didn't build or control the release cycles for, which would make QA a
> nightmare and bring many extra headaches for the Support teams.

And it's clearly documented in EPEL FAQ
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Is_EPEL_commercially_supported_by_Red_Hat.3F

Cheers,
Alan