[et-mgmt-tools] VM images

[David Lutterkort]

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 10:51 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 	I don't imagine this multi-VM appliance thing will ever work out and be
> useful, but if we did want to do that surely we'd have multiple 

That way, the relative position of existing tags doesn't change, though
it's really not much of a difference. (Though I find having all the
storage in one place a little cleaner)

David