[et-mgmt-tools] VM images

David Lutterkort dlutter at redhat.com
Thu Jun 28 18:31:24 UTC 2007

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 10:51 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 	I don't imagine this multi-VM appliance thing will ever work out and be
> useful, but if we did want to do that surely we'd have multiple <image>
> descriptions? The boot descriptions, disks and defaults are all distinct
> and unrelated ... the only metadata I can imagine to tie them all
> together would be some way for them to find each other on the network.
> 	(i.e. to allow for this, I'd just add an <images> root element)

My intention was to have that all in the image tag:


That way, the relative position of existing tags doesn't change, though
it's really not much of a difference. (Though I find having all the
storage in one place a little cleaner)


More information about the et-mgmt-tools mailing list