[et-mgmt-tools] Xen 'production' services - are we there yet?
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Tue Oct 23 10:32:49 UTC 2007
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We found virtualisation made a great solution for isolating different
> servers from each other. We had previously had a problem where our
> Apache required so many different modules to support the various
> different services we were running that the Apache config became
> extremely fragile. No such problem with Xen however since we just ran
> different Apache instances on different guests, with a web accelerator
> in front of them (a stripped down Apache with mod_proxy) so that all the
> backend Apaches would appear on the same IP address. You could reboot a
> backend server easily if it failed without affecting any other
> production service.
I should add that if you do consider an Apache configuration like the
above, then this little module is an absolute life-saver:
http://stderr.net/apache/rpaf/
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/et-mgmt-tools/attachments/20071023/30774b06/attachment.bin>
More information about the et-mgmt-tools
mailing list