[et-mgmt-tools] Xen 'production' services - are we there yet?

Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com
Tue Oct 23 10:32:49 UTC 2007


Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We found virtualisation made a great solution for isolating different 
> servers from each other.  We had previously had a problem where our 
> Apache required so many different modules to support the various 
> different services we were running that the Apache config became 
> extremely fragile.  No such problem with Xen however since we just ran 
> different Apache instances on different guests, with a web accelerator 
> in front of them (a stripped down Apache with mod_proxy) so that all the 
> backend Apaches would appear on the same IP address.  You could reboot a 
> backend server easily if it failed without affecting any other 
> production service.

I should add that if you do consider an Apache configuration like the 
above, then this little module is an absolute life-saver:

http://stderr.net/apache/rpaf/

Rich.

-- 
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.  Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/et-mgmt-tools/attachments/20071023/30774b06/attachment.bin>


More information about the et-mgmt-tools mailing list