[et-mgmt-tools] Seperate mailing lists revisited?

[Slinky]

+1 for separate list.


2008/7/1 Michael DeHaan <mdehaan at redhat.com>:

> With Cobbler, virsh, and virt-manager both getting a lot of traffic now
> (which is great!), I'm thinking we might want to revisit the idea of having
> seperate mailing lists.   Other similar projects like ovirt/func/etc have
> seperate lists, for instance.
>
> By default we could auto-invite everyone here to the new cobbler list, but
> we would not auto-subscribe everyone because that may not be desired.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> et-mgmt-tools mailing list
> et-mgmt-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/et-mgmt-tools/attachments/20080701/a8e5f5d1/attachment.htm>