[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: EXT3 Worries / Its the army brats that worry me!?!


	I was not trying to say that I don't appreciate the lengths that are being gone to in making sure a ready and powerfully stable product will be deployed when ext3 is released, merely was trying ascertain where it was in terms of how often it failed, or how many "know bugs" or issues there were with it. I have now heard several times that no one has recently had any problems with it, and will look forward to implementing it as soon as it is released into the kernel by the development team and as well Linus.

	My other concern, is of course the space issue with what can be tuned within ext2/ext3 to allow it to store files a bit more efficiently in terms of space. One thing I noticed when making a conversion from ext2 to ReiserFS (for the moment) was that ext2 used about 6.6GB and ReiserFS about 6.2GB for the same set of data. It not a major difference, but is noticeable.

	Now I will most likely be willing to trade off the space differential in exchange for a filesystem which can easily be resized by Partition Magic (ReiserFS cannot be), but would like to try to use space as efficiently as possible as I am a laptop user. In addition, laptops can be more limited in space than normal systems.

Very Respectfully, 

Stuart Blake Tener, IT3, USNR-R, N3GWG 
Beverly Hills, California
VTU 1904G (Volunteer Training Unit) 
stuart bh90210 net 
west coast: (310)-358-0202 P.O. Box 16043, Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2043 
east coast: (215)-338-6005 P.O. Box 45859, Philadelphia, PA 19149-5859 

Telecopier: (419)-715-6073 fax to email gateway via www.efax.com (it's free!) 


Monday, August 06, 2001 1:46 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: ext3-users-admin redhat com [mailto:ext3-users-admin redhat com]On Behalf Of Theodore Tso
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:02 PM
To: ext3-users redhat com
Subject: Re: EXT3 Worries / Its the army brats that worry me!?!

On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 11:41:46PM -0700, IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R wrote:
>             Well I do appreciate the fact that all upgrades and software
> implementations have risk, but, there comes a point when code must be frozen
> and be anointed as at some level of quality. I am not looking for you to
> send me a 10 page legal document offering a warranty and guarantee of all
> possible failures. Just was curious, if you though I would be loading
> software which works yet? Apparently, you seem to think so, as I saw no
> massive warnings in your response.

Well, here's my take on it.  It is my firm belief that Stephen Tweedie
and the rest of the ext3 filesystem developers (myself included), are
much more conservative about filesystem stability than the developers
of some other filesystem developers.  Specifically, I believe that
ext3 will prove to be far more stable than reseirfs was at the time
when SuSE started shipping it to all of its guinea
pigs^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Husers as part of their distribution.  Time
will tell whether or not I'm correct, but the truth is that the ext3
developers tend to be very careful about what we're willing to call
"production ready".

The I/S folks at my company were willing to risk the home directories
of all of our employees long before I was willing to certify it as
"production ready" (they didn't ask me first) --- on the other hand,
they didn't lose any data, either, and it worked just fine for them,
so one could argue they made the right choice.

That being said though, I would be nervous if ext3 and e2fsprogs were
used in life-critical or mission-critical applications, just simply
because I personally have very high standards for what that means.
Other developers might say, "Sure!  My code is ready for that!".  But
that may very well be an indication of those developer's
over-confidence (or my being overly paranoid), as opposed to any
indication to the relative code quality of ext3 versus other

I can make statements such as, "e2fsck is the only filesystem
consistency checker and repair utility which I'm aware of that has a
full and comprehensive regression test suite", and "I've never lost
any data with ext3, and I currently trust my laptop and all of my
e-mail to Linux-2.4.7 with ext3 0.9.5."  

You'll have to decide whether or not that's safe enough for your

                                                        - Ted

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]