e2defrag - Unable to allocate buffer for inode priorities

Theodore Tso tytso at mit.edu
Tue Oct 31 19:29:48 UTC 2006


Package: defrag
Version: 0.73pjm1-8
Severity: grave

On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:10:50AM +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > So now it was time to defrag, I used this command:
> > thor:~# e2defrag -r /dev/vgraid/data
> 
> This program is dangerous to use and any attempts to use it should be
> stopped.  It hasn't been updated in such a long time that it doesn't
> even KNOW that it is dangerous (i.e. it doesn't check the filesystem
> version number or feature flags).

In fact we need to create a Debian bug report indicating that this
package should *NOT* be included when the Debian etch distribution
releases.  

Goswin, I am setting the severity to grave (a release-critical
severity) because defrag right now is almost guaranteed to corrupt the
filesystem if used with modern ext3 filesystems leading to data loss,
and this satisfies the definition of grave.  I believe the correct
answer is either to (a) make defrag refuse to run if any filesystem
features are enabled (at the very least, resize_inode, but some of the
other newer ext3 filesystem features make me nervous with respect to
e2defrag, or (b) since (a) would make e2defrag mostly useless
especially since filesystems with resize inodes are created by default
in etch, and as far as I know upstream abandoned defrag a long time
ago, that we should simply remove e2defrag from etch and probably from
Debian altogether.

If you are interested in doing a huge amount of auditing and testing
of e2defrag with modern ext3 (and soon ext4) filesystems, that's
great, but I suspect that will not at all be trivial, and even making
sure e2defrag won't scramble users' data probably can't be achievable
before etch releases.

Regards,


						- Ted




More information about the Ext3-users mailing list