forced fsck (again?)

[Stephen Samuel]

On Jan 22, 2008 7:35 PM, Bryan Kadzban <bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> (Actually, what about GPL versions?  It looks like e2fsprogs is still at
> GPL version 2 -- that's OK with me, but do I need to say "v2 only", "v2
> or later", or nothing specific?)
>
My suggestion is 'V2 or later', since that covers V2,  V3 (and, eventually,
Vs 4, 5, 6 and 7).

-- 
Stephen Samuel http://www.bcgreen.com
778-861-7641
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20080122/9b6cde70/attachment.htm>