[fab] Re: openmotif
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Aug 30 13:50:40 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 09:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> As for the applications that depend on motif, I say we do the following:
> >>
> >> 1) Announce that openmotif will be dropped in X days, weeks.
> >> 2) Provide information o lesstif as the alternative.
> >> 3) Maintainers of packages that have motif dependencies have the same X
> >> days, or weeks to fix their applications to work with lesstif
> >> 4) Drop openmotif after the time period has elapsed
> >> 5) Deal with any unfixed packages at that time.
> >
> > I like this plan a lot. It sets deadlines and expectations properly.
> > openmotif just needs to go away.
> >
> > So who can make said announcement?
>
> I can be play the bad-cop here. Question is, how long of a deadline for
> step 1? Is 2 weeks enough?
This is exactly my proposal.
Test3 freeze is on the 5th of Sept, and that's a little too soon. While I
don't like "shipping" yet another "release" with openmotif, I think its
unreasonable to expect these things to be fixed by Tuesday. October 2nd is
the final development freeze, and that seems like a good cutoff point to me.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060830/e76183ec/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list