[fab] [Fwd: Free software and Fedora: Dissected]

[Karsten Wade]

> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>

selinux-doc        || Public Use License   || Examine LICENSE (4)

I can't find an actual copy of this license; googling for: 

http://www.google.com/search?q=selinux+%22public+use+license%22

Surprise, surprise ... all references are to the selinux-doc package, no
links to the text of the license.

Depending on how difficult it is, perhaps this one could be relicensed.
Dan Walsh is probably the person to contact.  I'd reckon that Red Hat
would -prefer- to license our contributions under the OPL.

Does the OPL qualify as libre by FSF standards?  Hope so, because the
release notes are now a stand-along package in Core
(fedora-release-notes), and they are under the OPL.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060803/00ca43e6/attachment.sig>