[fab] JBJ considered harmfull

[Paul W. Frields]

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:30 -0400, Michael Tiemann wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:17 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:10 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here are the questions that we *must* answer.  If internal engineering at 
> > > Red Hat is not willing to answer them, then the august body that is the 
> > > Fedora Board must at least take a position.
> > > 
> > > 1. Who is the upstream provider of RPM?  Is it rpm.org?  jbj?  Red Hat?  
> > > Fedora?
> > > 
> > > 2. If we are not the upstream of RPM -- and I'd argue we're not -- is it 
> > > our intention to reunite with the RPM codebase at some point in the 
> > > future, or not?
> > > 
> > > 3. If we are not going to rejoin with upstream RPM -- and I'd argue we're
> > > not -- then we have, in fact, forked RPM.  Therefore, what's the name of
> > > the new project, who is the upstream (Red Hat? Fedora?) and how do we act
> > > as an effective upstream for this project?
> > > 
> > > We will continue to deal with these unpleasant issues until we have the 
> > > courage to resolve them.
> > > 
> > > Again, just my $0.02.
> > 
> > Gets my $0.02 as well.
> 
> And mine!  Greg, do you accept PayPal?

I'm anteing up too.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060808/3a95e984/attachment.sig>