[fab] Fedora Logo Proposal
Dennis Gilmore
dennis at ausil.us
Wed Aug 9 20:37:26 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 8:12 am, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 August 2006 08:40, Rahul wrote:
> > We dont need to provide them hardware. We need to connect the existing
> > hardware to the buildsystems and do the regular builds, testing etc.
>
> This will be a huge barrier for fostering lower tier arches. Some of the
> hardware they get will not be suitable for placement in the colo. We
> shouldn't hamstring them by forcing their resources to be within Fedora's
> grasp. We have to trust them to use their own hardware in their own
> infrastructure to get the project off the ground.
Having Done the whole building extras for another arch thing. Ill put my 2c
in I have and have access to enough hardware to build extras. currently i do
it by running a daily cron job that rsyncs the extras tree and queues all
the packages. Ones that fail to build I need to manually look at and
either fix or ignore. Some packages build but dont run. Currently i
cant test everything. I test what i use but rely on the Aurora community to
file bugs. I have in aurora's bugzilla extras components but have never
yet had a bug report filed. When i started I posted to some of the fedora
lists stating what i was doing and checking out if i could use Red hats
bugzilla and have any sparc bug cced to me. which is a level of granularity
that bugzilla does not offer
I have a perl script i wrote that is on my website that parses the output of
decribecomponents.cgi and inserts into my db the new ones. its kinda crude
but available under the GPL. I guess perhaps i should post how i have
everything setup so that other arches have a guide to follow.
i have had quite a bit of feedback in irc and email. and if people ask for
packages i direct them to get them in Fedora extras. I have not had any
package requests that are SPARC specific. Some packages in extras have
aurora specific conditionals. most bugs i have filed have been well received
every so often I get a maintainer who says we done support sparc so im not
fixing. Even though i generally have a fix. I get the same thing with core
packages also. Most maintainers are good a few just wont touch it.
I personally try to get everyfix i make applied upstream (fedora core/extras)
as i feel they should live there. or be futher passed to the individual
projects. As far as infrastructure goes. I think we have what we need to
put out a good product. Some of what we have is rack mountable but not all
of it is. I use a similar setup to extras. so if at some point we merge
things in it shouldn't be to hard a too much of a change.
--
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
Proud Australian
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list