[fab] New project formation is out of control

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 02:42 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 16:50, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:
> > My $0.02:
> >
> > I wouldn't have SIGs report necessarily to any Project.  If an existing
> > project chooses to kick out a new SIG, fine.  If someone wants to align a
> > SIG to a Project, fine.  But if a SIG wants to sprout in the desert, doing
> > their own work in a little corner of the wiki, then that should be fine,
> > too.
> >
> 
> I generally agree, but we must give a process for such SIGs to follow to get 
> the help and review they need.  That should be trivial.
> 
> As a base policy, I'm happy with what this thread has produced.  Paul, do feel 
> free to make the necessary edits.  Once that's hammered out, we can start 
> talking about the finer details, such as naming conventions.

For those of you not watching the page, I did some editing tonight on
this.  I am using the "SIG" designation for now.  If people could give
some comments or +/-1 that would be great.  I'm subscribed to the page,
so if you want to add comments in it, go right ahead.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060810/761d84e8/attachment.sig>