[fab] [Fwd: What is the mkisofs license?]

[Rex Dieter]

Rahul wrote:
> Tom Callaway wrote:

>> We don't need to analyze Extras for FSF license compliance, IMHO.

> The packaging guidelines changes if any would affect both the 
> repositories and the distribution on the whole includes both. Not sure 
> why you would consider excluding Fedora Extras.

AFAIK, no one has proposed/sugggested so far that Fedora's packaging 
guidelines require FSF license compliance (instead of simply 
opensource.org ) yet.

-- Rex