[fab] [Fwd: What is the mkisofs license?]

[Rahul]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rahul wrote:
>> Tom Callaway wrote:
> 
>>> We don't need to analyze Extras for FSF license compliance, IMHO.
> 
>> The packaging guidelines changes if any would affect both the 
>> repositories and the distribution on the whole includes both. Not sure 
>> why you would consider excluding Fedora Extras.
> 
> AFAIK, no one has proposed/sugggested so far that Fedora's packaging 
> guidelines require FSF license compliance (instead of simply 
> opensource.org ) yet.
> 

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-April/msg00170.html

I have independently done the same to the board. I would like to know if 
others support this or not.

Rahul



Rahul