[fab] dealing with rpm.

[Rahul]

seth vidal wrote:

>>> what do y'all think?
>> +1. Wouldnt reviving rpm.org be better than finding another place though?
>>
>>
> 
> rpm.org is on red hat servers.
> 
> neutral, to me, means an exec at any one company can't order it taken
> offline. :)
> 

Ok. I dont think thats really a big issue. I havent heard anyone ever 
accused Red Hat of controlling GNOME just because gnome.org is hosted by 
Red Hat (on probably the same server as rpm.org even). If thats really a 
concern,move rpm.org hosting to some other place then instead of 
creating a new project place.

My point is rpm.org is the natural place most people are going to look 
when filing bugs, looking to discuss spec issues, documentation etc.

Rahul