[fab] what's left?

[Christopher Blizzard]

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Christopher Blizzard (blizzard at redhat.com) said: 
>> As for the second question, it's just asking if we had licensing 
>> problems with anything in FC that we just pushed to extras instead of 
>> getting rid of it entirely.  That status email is vague in that respect.
> 
> AFAIK, Extras already follows OSI/FSF licensing, so anything that's not
> good enough for Core isn't good enough for Extras either.
> 
> Bill
> 

That's good, but it still needs an audit, no?  Have the extras folks 
been super-vigilant?  To be frank, I would have thought that we as a 
company would have been equally as vigilant but if there's anything I've 
learned it's that we had a lot of crap in our distro.

--Chris