Fedora release lifecyle

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> If we are not planning on having Fedora as a stable server, we should
> not release a server variant. If we are going to do desktop and server
> variants, we should put some incrementally more effort into actually
> have something useful in each of these variants rather than just a
> different bunch of packages and stop going back and forth on what we are
> trying to do. I do agree that we should find some middle ground but I
> dont we have that already with the existing plan.

A server spin isn't necessarily for somebody to go out and base critical apps 
on the spin.  It's a way of composing the distro that might make sense for 
somebody doing server like tasks, and looking at Fedora as a precursor to the 
next RHEL.  And see Bill's email that just came in (:

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20061213/0bdf1f9f/attachment.sig>