[fab] Succession Planning

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Greg DeKoenigsberg schrieb:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Rahul wrote:
>> on 3) Can we put 75% in numbers? What is the rationale behind having a 
>> limit on Red Hat or non Red Hat seats? IMO, if its a elected position, 
>> whoever gets elected should be deemed fit to do the job regardless of 
>> their affiliation. Is Max Spevack, the Fedora Board lead or he is the 
>> Fedora lead within Red Hat. If its the former, should it be a elected 
>> position by Fedora contributors (as defined by rule 4)  or within the board?
> Personally, I like the idea of splitting the board into two different term 
> cycles.  For example:
> 
> Term A, elections after release of FC(even)
> Community 1
> Community 2
> Red Hat 1
> Red Hat 2
> Red Hat 3
> 
> Term B, elections after release of FC(odd)
> Community 3
> Community 4
> Red Hat 4
> Red Hat 5
> 
> Gurantees continuity -- without math.  :)

+1

CU
thl