[fab] Succession Planning
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Wed Jul 26 18:24:21 UTC 2006
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 19:41 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >> 4) CLA completion and being part of atleast one specific Fedora group
> >> like say Fedora Extras must be a requirement. Not everybody who has
> >> signed the CLA has provided any meaningful contributions and thus are
> >> not in the group of actual Fedora contributors. Having merely the CLA as
> >> a requirement might be abused.
> >
> > How do we define being "part of" a group? Number of CVS commits?
> > Number of emails posted to a list? Time on IRC? If you can provide an
> > objective standard for this criterion, let's discuss it.
>
> Part of any Fedora group in the accounts system.
One way to measure is to require activity as an elected member of a
sub-project committee, such as FESCO or FDSCo.
Perhaps each sub-project could have a way of qualifying. Number of
packages owned or reviewed; documents written, edited, or translated;
events attended as an Ambassador; etc.
Or do we specifically want to allow for the possibility of a disruptive
election that can bring in dilettantes who only know how to campaign for
votes?
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060726/cbd1ca14/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list