[fab] 108

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> One problem we've been trying to tackle is providing
> infrastructure(*) 
> for Fedora (sub)Projects.  So, is 108 appropriate for this?
> 
> (*) project space, mailing lists, etc... 

The problem currently is that 108 is comprised of some closed source
bits.  From a Fedora Project standpoint thats a non-starter.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060627/1f4e117f/attachment.sig>