[fab] 30-Day Certified GoDaddy.com Renewal Notice (fwd)

[Patrick W. Barnes]

On Thursday 04 May 2006 16:57, "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should hold on to these names for the foreseeable future.  We
> > want to guard against potentially hostile squatters, and also it would
> > be painful a few years from now if we change our mind and want to do a
> > Foundation.  This is a tiny price to pay for insurance against these
> > issues.
>
> If we do keep them, they should point to something useful, like a
> webpage with the current explanation of why the fedorafoundation was
> not done and how the current fedora group is structured.
>

I agree that we should hold onto them, at least for this year.  If we're going 
to point them at a particular resource, it should probably be our existing 
page of information about the Foundation:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundation

> > fedora.org expires on May 28th, 2006.  Attempt to grab that? =)
>
> And put the various special interest groups's page on that?
>

...or just point it straight at fedoraproject.org.  :-)

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com

http://www.n-man.com/

LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060504/675734d4/attachment.sig>