[fab] Governing body to handle package guideline issues
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed May 17 15:20:36 UTC 2006
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:10 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
> Personally, I don't think this group needs to be some sort of elected
> body. I think we should be able to pretty easily determine who the right
> people are, and from that group elect/appoint a leader. Then we just need
> to make it very clear what the mandate of this group is, give it a wiki
> page and an email list, and let it go.
I agree.
> something like:
>
> - make decisions about packaging guidelines for Extras and Core
> - what else?
- Be able to actually edit said guidelines
- Inform necessary parties that said changes happened
- Work with build-sys team when buildsys makes changes to packages in
the base build setup (this is the current issue)
- Provide a discussion place for such changes
- Own a bugzilla or other ticketing item for when people have
issues/bugs with the guidelines.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060517/4de60ad6/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list