[fab] Governing body to handle package guideline issues

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed May 17 15:20:36 UTC 2006


On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:10 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
> Personally, I don't think this group needs to be some sort of elected 
> body.  I think we should be able to pretty easily determine who the right 
> people are, and from that group elect/appoint a leader.  Then we just need 
> to make it very clear what the mandate of this group is, give it a wiki 
> page and an email list, and let it go.

I agree.

> something like:
> 
> - make decisions about packaging guidelines for Extras and Core
> - what else? 

- Be able to actually edit said guidelines
- Inform necessary parties that said changes happened
- Work with build-sys team when buildsys makes changes to packages in
the base build setup (this is the current issue)
- Provide a discussion place for such changes
- Own a bugzilla or other ticketing item for when people have
issues/bugs with the guidelines.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060517/4de60ad6/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list