[fab] Non-standard kernels in the Fedora Multiverse

[Paul W. Frields]

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 20:24 +0200, Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:
> katzj at redhat.com said:
> > The requirement of a bugzilla account is the only thing that gives developers
> > a chance[1] of getting the information they need to solve problems.
> 
> IMHO, the tool should offer a choice:
>  - anonymous report, making it clear the developer will have no chance to ask
>    further info and/or discuss the issue, which drasticaly lowers the chances
>    the bug will get fixed
>  - use BZ account, offering to open one if needed
> 
> But maybe this gets too complicated ?

Why not?  Would it make sense for it to consult the same data sources as
the gnome-about-me tool, to make the process faster for the user?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060509/d7eeaa88/attachment.sig>