[fab] Fedora Logo versus OPL License

Patrick W. Barnes nman64 at n-man.com
Tue May 23 07:05:51 UTC 2006


On Tuesday 23 May 2006 01:48, "Chitlesh GOORAH" <chitlesh at fedoraproject.org> 
wrote:
> On 5/23/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > You are wrong. The logo or artwork is not licensed under OPL.
> >
> > Rahul
>
> But since the Fedora Logo is now part of the contents of the wiki. It
> may be considered as OPL ?

I can see where you would get that idea, but it isn't the case.

In the future, you should also avoid referring to draft documentation, 
especially for legal issues.  The canonical reference is in the Legal section 
of the wiki.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com

http://www.n-man.com/

LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20060523/d1585eb7/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list