[Fedora Project Wiki] Update of "Infrastructure/ProjectHosting" by BillNottingham

[Bill Nottingham]

Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said: 
> On Tuesday 21 November 2006 10:53, you wrote:
> > +  * Issue tracking (is bz OK?)
> 
> So the reason I don't think bz is OK is that if we continue to use our BZ for 
> new projects the Product list will get quite large quite fast.  Users trying 
> to use bugzilla.redhat.com to file bugs against say Fedora or RHEL will be 
> hit with a very large product list to choose from, and even more confusing if 
> they're filing a bug against a package that exists in one of these products, 
> but the package's upstream bugs are hosted on our bugzilla, the bug may get 
> filed upstream but we'd never know "downstream" about it.

Why not 'Fedora Hosted Projects' -> component, much like gnome.org?

Alternatively, a single upstream BZ for all hosted projects.

Bill