[fab] Architecture Policy.

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 16 November 2006 16:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said:
> > Sure, but how can you tell?  How can you tell what somebody might have
> > done to get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up
> > in an iso?
>
> So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build
> it? Why would someone go to that much effort?

I don't know, but I just think a blanket "built from Fedora sources can be 
Fedora" is a bit too far reaching.  "Built from Fedora sources by Fedora 
tools" seems a bit safer to me, but still should get board approval to use 
the logo/trademark.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20061116/d14873a1/attachment.sig>