FESCo future

[Greg Dekoenigsberg]

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

>> Why not send that signal through an open election?
>
> I think that's not enough for now as we did quite bad with setting the
> sign "we seriously want the community involved in Fedora" in the past years.

Then, imho, we've got the same problem in reverse.  Saying that "50% of 
the F-star board is guaranteed to be non-RH" is every bit as bad as saying 
that "50% of the F-star board is guaranteed to be RH."

The people who do the work of building packages for Fedora decide what the 
governance of F-star is.  Full stop.

We shouldn't try to address problems of perception by making arbitrary 
decisions in the present.  We should decide what is right, and do it.

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------