FESCo future
Greg Dekoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Mon Nov 27 17:33:23 UTC 2006
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Why not send that signal through an open election?
>
> I think that's not enough for now as we did quite bad with setting the
> sign "we seriously want the community involved in Fedora" in the past years.
Then, imho, we've got the same problem in reverse. Saying that "50% of
the F-star board is guaranteed to be non-RH" is every bit as bad as saying
that "50% of the F-star board is guaranteed to be RH."
The people who do the work of building packages for Fedora decide what the
governance of F-star is. Full stop.
We shouldn't try to address problems of perception by making arbitrary
decisions in the present. We should decide what is right, and do it.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list