[fab] Alternative kernels?
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Wed Sep 20 19:52:53 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 01:01 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> >
> > If we allow arbitrary kernels that are maintained in Extras, how do we
> > make sure that there's actually a consistent set of features provided?
>
> We dont need to allow arbitrary kernels. Can we allow Planet CCRMA
> kernel or the OLPC kernel?
Can we leave OLPC out of this for now? Yay for OLPC, but only a few
people have hardware that it could actually be used on. Planet CCRMA is
a much more realistic case.
> > And that's ignoring the questions of currency and handling of security
> > errata, which is already hard enough.
>
> Yes. A good maintainer would be required. Fortunately, in both these
> case we have one. RT patch set is being pushed very heavily upstream by
> Ingo and is expected to take a few revisions.
Does Ingo want to maintain a kernel _package_ though?
josh
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list