CLA requirements

[Thomas Chung]

On 2/21/07, Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > that. Do we really need CLA for groups like bug triaging and ambassadors
> > majority of whom dont submit any content to the project?
>
> Hello,
> Ambassadors should have cla_done. I thought we have already talked
> about this on the Fedora Ambassadors mailing list.
> Since content is the only that matter for the CLA, we must not forget
> that Fedora Ambassadors provide fedora with some slides, videos,
> pictures, marketing brochure,..... It would be wise to keep the
> current on-going situation as it is. If not, no one can track who
> signed CLA and posted what. Having a standard protocol will ease the
> overall load of man power.
>
> Chitlesh

+1 for Chitlesh

-- 
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung