CLA requirements

[Thomas Chung]

On 2/23/07, Patrick W. Barnes <nman64 at n-man.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > > Then, these people should be directed to fedora marketing.
> >
> > This is the club mentality I would want to avoid.
> >
>
> It's not a club mentality.  Ambassadors isn't for people who just want to
> attend an event, or who just want to comment on Fedora.  It is for people who
> intend to work with us to produce materials, conduct planning, manage
> spending, and other such tasks that invariably end up requiring a completed
> CLA.  Even in cases where the CLA isn't explicitly necessary, we need an
> identity and contact information, and the CLA is only a small step beyond
> that.  It's really not much to ask for the amount of trust we place in them
> for their trouble.

+1 for Patrick
-- 
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung